26 feb

Twas the Night for the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Twas the Night for the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas Day? You are able to bet on it! (Image: zombieapocalypse.com)

Every year punters spot bets on whether or not they will awaken to a snowy blanket across their streets on Christmas morning. Oahu is the old romantic in each of us that longs for this scenic backdrop to a joyous day, surrounded by our liked ones and overeating with the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and distributing our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

While some are gambling for a white Christmas, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this yuletide being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is clearly a nice, festive idea to possess, and beats the odds they provide for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League in 2010 at 5000/1. Discuss harmful gambling.

’we are quite confident that the odds of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they ought not to be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and consume the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Chances for a white xmas currently stand at 5/1, which is really a much better chance than those offered on the doomsday coming associated with undead, and you’re more likely in order to claim your winnings after a bit of snow rather than having to fight your way through the zombie hordes to collect your reward. If you got that bet right, that’s for sure although you would be pretty smug with yourself.

While the possibility to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is a lot more than likely a bit that is nice of for Ladbrokes, Sean web Page zombie specialist and founder associated with the Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to prepare for the worst.

’The public is always interested in the chances of a white Christmas time, nonetheless they ought to be more concerned by the increasing chance of the Zombie Apocalypse,’ reported Page, suggesting, maybe, that he is nipping during the whiskey by having a bit way too much alacrity.

’The many most likely time for an outbreak is during the busy yuletide season as people save money time in large groups, rendering it easier for the zombie virus to spread, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page included. Apparently, he’s seen it happen before.

Bets That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems too low for the probability of a zombie epidemic really, but this is not the time that is first has offered the chance to place wagers on the Apocalypse, real-money-casino.club because they also offered equivalent odds on the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, because of all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ’enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in expectation of their impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are additionally providing much more likely chances of 500/1 in the chance of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, nevertheless the smart money in this instance would probably be on the zombies, even though you know, end of the world and all that that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the. So less ’nothing was stirring’ and more ’watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside the door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Still Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Just when you thought no body would ever be good sufficient for Massachusetts’ insanely fastidious gaming commission, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative supply that could have its TV that is own series ’MGC P.I.’ suggested that MGM Resorts be found suitable to progress with their Springfield casino task, with the caveat that MGM executives be able to talk their way out of a few lingering issues for the commission, concerns that came to light once the commission conducted its regulatory background check regarding the casino company.

Cleared for Take Off

We aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent the past 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from setting up house in the pristine state of Massachusetts when we say ’lengthy.

But it’s not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the last word on whether or not MGM will be able to work in their neck of the woods. But then be able to submit their last application as the one and only western Massachusetts casino license that will be given out; and since they’re the only remaining applicant, that would seem to be a pretty done deal if they give their papal blessing to the company, MGM will.

The only tiny ding that the Bureau could dig up after nearly a 12 months of searching all documented in a 500-page report on this issue was MGM’s way of dealing previous executive board member Terry Christensen, whom in 2008 was convicted on costs relating to the wiretapping of company mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian ended up being included in a gruesome child support fight.

’Despite his indictment, resignation from the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was allowed to engage, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in some delicate and non-public corporate issues of MGM Resorts … including his attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate with the Commission as of this week’s hearing, noting that it turned out a mistake for the company to allow boy that is bad to carry on in any capability with the business.

’we exercised poor judgment,’ stated Murren, who had previously been the outfit’s CFO whenever all this took place. ’It was an idea that is bad the very beginning. None of us should have had any contact with (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren ended up beingn’t the only person to throw himself in the mercy associated with the court, as present MGM board member (and head of its audit committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to share with commissioners that protocols are now set up within the company to guarantee here will undoubtedly be no repeats of this poor process that is decision-making.

All that was then left for the commish to deal with had been a few concerns they had about some MGM transactions in Macau; mostly, these centered around a partnership that is former Chinese company mogul (and daughter of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as somebody during a 2010 nj-new Jersey regulatory hearing on the problem, and also as such, MGM had to unload a 50 percent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, just to keep their nose clean. The allegations were that Ho’s dad Stanley had had dealings with some Chinese gangs, a definite ’no-no’ in today’s regulatory gaming universe.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been included with MGM completely separate from her father, and that she was mainly involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been fine with the Ho interaction; specifically, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no problem with it. He additionally noted that New Jersey has now softened their stance that is own may enable MGM back to the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later on this week; the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby will not state which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness when controling these issues.

But also being truly the only applicant and even if cleared by the commission this it’s still not a 100 percent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts week.

’One applicant or 10, we shall hold their feet to the fire to make certain we have a really good application,’ Crosby recommended reporters within a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for Two Years

PokerStars got a smack from nj-new jersey regulators this week once they put them in licensing limbo for the following two years

If there is one name that has dominated the American on the web poker market over the last decade, it has become PokerStars. However if you’re living in New Jersey, you shouldn’t expect you’ll be playing on a site operated by the poker giant any right time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The nj-new Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made the decision this to suspend the review of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling license for two years, effectively locking the company out of the state’s online poker marketplace for that time period week.

’The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the effective use of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino solution industry licensure (CSIE) is in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division said in a declaration.

However, the door is not entirely closed on PokerStars.

’The Division, within that duration, may think about a request for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, at which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars as well as its entities that are affiliated associated individuals are going to be resumed to evaluate suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled its case with all the government and admitted no wrongdoing as a part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have some issues with the company. Chief among those appears to be their association with founder Isai Scheinberg, that has been under federal indictment since Black Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and has not come to the U.S. to face those charges, to no one’s surprise.

While this is a loss that is huge PokerStars, it also marks a giant win for the competitors in the nj-new Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently has a 50 percent share of the state’s poker market, because of the Caesars/888 World number of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could effortlessly have been overshadowed by the PokerStars site which would happen operated along with Resorts Casino and had been hoping that their mind start would give them an advantage that allows them to stay competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to build up brand name commitment, something that PokerStars might have a hard time conquering, if so when they truly are finally licensed for brand New Jersey’s online marketplace.

PokerStars was predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that hawaii’s decision could improvement in the long term.

’We are disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ stated PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ’We note that the DGE will resume the review of our application if our circumstances change. We will stay in open discussion with the DGE and will update them on alterations in our situation as they occur.’

This had not been initial result that is disappointing PokerStars in New Jersey. Formerly, the ongoing company had tried to buy the Atlantic Club Casino, just to have that deal fall apart over questions about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That decision was also costly, as PokerStars lost about $11 million that they had spent on casino expenses a total that was supposed to be used to the eventual $15 million purchase price.

LEAVE A REPLY